Live from Nashville, we are rolling out the online voter pledge for YDA. Go to yda.org/4 and sign the pledge now.
I’m about to head to the airport here in Phoenix. While we are in Nashville feel free to come talk to me about the blog, things that you would like to see covered, anger at my blatant use of comma splices, whatever you want.
I won’t be bringing a laptop (so I won’t be tempted) so I will probably not be posting anything until I get back to Phoenix to write a recap post.
See you soon.
In Outright Barbarous: How the Violent Language of the Right Poisons American Democracy, Jeffrey Feldman analyzes the use of violent language by right-wing pundits and how it undermines the American tradition of working together to solve our problems. He looks at the debates on gun control and immigration, the use of September 11th, the language of Bill O’Reilly and James Dobson, as well as the perceived “war against Christmas” in order to illustrate how pervasive the violent framing of civic debate has become.
Feldman’s aim is to “take a longer, more detailed look at what right-wing pundits have said with the goal of understanding the kind of public conversation their words have built.” He calls his readers to action to “refuse to accept it, talk about the important issues it obscures, and work together to improve our civic discourse.”
He believes that America’s “lost passion for discussion in politics and the rise of a mass media with entertainment for profit as its central goal” is enabling the violent framing of political debates to continue without check. The public needs “a media with an interest in that conversation that is prioritized above the bottom-line.”
Feldman offers six suggestions to help re-frame the political debate:
Feldman looks to the rise of the Millennials as hope for the creation of new deliberative forums.
In many ways, the generation referred to as the “Millennials” (those born post-1980) is already involved with this task, creating and inhabiting these new forums with regularity and enthusiasm.
The rise of the Millennials is also leading to discussions about “harnessing social networking technology for the practice of government itself.”
Here are some of the questions and thoughts I wrote in the margins of my copy while reading:
Have you read the book? What are your thoughts? If not go pick yourself up a copy and come back to join the conversation.
![]()
I know what you are thinking. What is Kevin doing talking about another online service when we are just starting to figure out what the hell a Twitter is? I feel your pain. Actually, I don’t because I love this stuff, but I do understand your pain.
Well, for those of you that are adventurous, Friendfeed is a social network aggregator that takes your contributions from a whole litany of social networking sites and puts them in one place for discussion.
Friendfeed has recently created a rooms feature that allows you to have a topic-specific room for discussion and sharing, so I have started a Youth Vote room. So if you have a Friendfeed account or are interested in creating one check it out. My account is here if you want to see it or add me.
Luigi Montanez wrote a great post on TechPresident about the perfect campaign email. He used the recent Hillary Clinton campaign’s Kentucky/Oregon appeal to show exactly what an email should look like.
So some simple rules to live by:
- Choose a clear message and a clear action. If you can’t keep it simple, don’t send the email.
- Limit messages to 5 to 7 paragraphs.
- A clickable rectangular graphic aligned to the right of the opening paragraphs will always get the most clicks.
- Do not embed links in a larger paragraph. Allow them to stand alone with whitespace above and below.
- Use formatting like bold, underline, and italics sparingly, and only to drive the main point.
That’s only a taste of the post. I encourage you to go read the whole article.

|