The economic downturn — combined with the crashes of the sub-prime mortgage and housing markets — has hit Arizona especially hard. Yet as Valley residents struggle to stay in their homes, perennial congressional candidate David Schweikert is circling overhead, preying on homeowners and profiting from Arizona’s foreclosure crisis.

“Stabilizing our housing sector is critical to Arizona’s economic recovery, but David Schweikert is banking on its failure,” said Luis Heredia, Arizona Democratic Party executive director. “After mismanaging his second failed campaign for Congress and racking up a half-million dollars in campaign debt, I can see the desire to make a quick buck. But doing so on the backs of suffering families who are being foreclosed on and forced onto the streets is despicable.”

For two years, Schweikert has not been forthcoming about his real estate dealings, particularly how they relate to the housing and foreclosure crisis that continues to rock Arizona’s economy and ravage our neighborhoods. He has remained conspicuously vague when discussing his occupation, describing himself as “a small business man” or the owner of a small “real estate business.” But the fact is, he is a predatory real-estate investor – the type of investor that real estate experts often call a “vulture” or “bottom feeder” because they profit from failed, foreclosure-ridden markets.

“Arizona is second in the nation in foreclosures. And in this market, our loss is literally David Schweikert’s gain,” Heredia said.

Today, the Arizona Democratic Party is launching www.yourlosshisgain.com, so Arizona residents can read the facts for themselves and see how Schweikert’s foreclosure investment scheme blooms in an unstable, falling economy by profiting off the misery of others and threatening Arizona’s long-term recovery.

Among the website’s highlights:

* In some of the most hard-hit neighborhoods in the Valley, Schweikert has expanded his foreclosure scheme to include more than $11 million in real estate holdings [Source: Maricopa County Recorder]

* While claiming to revitalize neighborhoods, Schweikert’s company has been cited repeatedly for blight and neglect, facing thousands of dollars in fines. [Source: City of Phoenix]

* Schweikert’s foreclosure investment scheme has the potential to further shake Arizona neighborhoods by thwarting long-term investment, with short-term rental gain. Law enforcement experts say that the large numbers of rental homes in the Valley make their jobs more difficult because criminal human smugglers and Mexican cartels frequently use rentals as “drop houses” used in the trafficking of illegal immigrants and drugs. [Arizona Republic, Aug. 31, 2008]

* Schweikert has made hundreds of thousands of dollars in the last year operating his home foreclosure investment scheme. [Source: 2009 Schweikert Personal Financial Disclosure Statement]

Follow The Money

Shortly after his second failed congressional campaign came to an end in 2008, Schweikert announced he was going to run for Congress again. [Source: The Arizona Capitol Times' Yellow Sheet, “Schweikert: Another ‘Crazy’ Run in 2010,” November 10, 2008].

Since then, he’s racked up a half-million dollars in campaign debt to self-fund another congressional run. Not only are the profits from Schweikert’s foreclosure investment scheme lining his own pockets, they are lining the pockets of his business partners, who in turn, are contributing heavily to his third, debt-ridden congressional campaign. [Source: The Federal Elections Commission, August 12, 2010]

“Unfortunately, it’s not the first time shady real estate dealings and shell games have ensnarled political officials in Arizona – just ask Rick Renzi or Fife Symington,” Heredia said. “While David Schweikert says he wants to clean up Washington, it’s clear that his clean-up exercise should start in his backyard(s). He should start by disclosing the size and nature of his predatory scheme, who his investors are and how much they’ve already made off the backs of Arizona families.”

• 0 Comments

“Another provision of health insurance reform to give greater health care security to American families is moving forward with guidance released yesterday on the benefit for young adults to stay covered under their parents’ insurance plans until age 26.

“The effective date of this new policy is September 23, 2010, but due to outreach by Democrats to encourage insurance companies to act early, every major insurer has said they will provide continuous coverage for young adults immediately. This means that many students graduating from college this spring will be able to retain coverage as they begin their adult lives and launch their careers.

“So instead of going through their early 20’s crossing their fingers and hoping they stay healthy, young adults will now have an option for affordable health care, and families will have the peace of mind that all their loved ones will be covered.

“This benefit is one of the many that have taken affect in the seven weeks since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law – and one that Republicans would take away if they ever succeeded in repealing reform. Rather than deny Americans benefits that give them more control over their health care, Democrats will continue working to make health care work better for families and small businesses.”

• 0 Comments

Young Democrats of America Vice-President Colmon Elridge of Kentucky issued the following statement regarding the actions of Senator Jim Bunning:

It is unfortunate that Senator Jim Bunning has been away from Kentucky so long that he has forgotten the values that have shaped our Commonwealth and the spirit of commitment to the common good that is present in communities from Pikeville to Paducah and everywhere in between.

Because of the actions of the Junior Senator from Kentucky, one million Americans stand to lose their unemployment insurance. One million Americans, their families, and their communities will suffer because one person has put politics above people and partisanship above compassion for his fellow man.

The people of Kentucky deserve a Senator who shares our values. “United We Stand, Divided We Fall” are more than just words on our state flag. They are a reminder that how we survive as Kentuckians – and Americans – is to offer a helping hand to those in need and to work in a spirit of good-faith to shape America into that more perfect union.

Senator Bunning’s actions prove that a strong Democratic presence is needed in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. This incident stresses the importance of wining in November and returning a Kentuckian to Washington that shares our values and speaks to the common decency. Young Democrats are dedicated to shaping a Kentucky and an America that rise above these petty political maneuvers and put people first. My only wish is that, as so many Kentuckians who have served us in our nation’s capitol have done before, Senator Bunning would have retired a statesman and not a tyrant.

Colmon Elridge III
Vice-President
Young Democrats of America

• 0 Comments

As Democrats approach the end of their first year of the 21st century in control of both Congress and the White House, we are reminded of a hard truth: progressive change is much more difficult than conservative retrenchment.

Throughout history change has always faced an uphill battle against the seductive forces of fear, hatred, dogma, and tradition. In fact, major progressive change is so difficult and occurs so infrequently that such victories are historical outliers. As Mike Lux points out, only four or five decades in the history of the United States have proved to be fertile ground for such change.

Some believed that the 21st century would be different, that the proliferation of technology and the internet would be a panacea. However, this view ignored those aspects of this century that make change more difficult. While it is true that the internet has enabled more public participation and government transparency and allowed people to compete with the media power of corporate television and radio, it also allowed people to self-select their news, information, and facts. No longer can a Walter Cronkite turn the tide of American public opinion against a war with a single statement. The internet is a value-neutral platform and it spreads conservative messages just as effectively as progressive ones. Life expectancy is dramatically longer than in the past, slowing generational change and keeping old prejudices and fears alive (this is where conservatives will convince themselves that I am arguing for death panels as a progressive conspiracy). Change today will be just as difficult as it has been in the past.

Also extinguished a year in is the naïve belief in bipartisanship, that we can convince Republicans to join with Democrats to do the right thing for the American people. Bipartisanship only exists when there is a Republican in the White House, and such bipartisanship has had devastating consequences (see Iraq War, Bush’s tax cuts to the wealthy, deregulation).

Republicans view government as a zero-sum game. Health care is not a service for the American people but a battle to be fought for political gain. Helping the uninsured and those who have had the American dream shattered by health care costs is nothing compared to the potential to recreate Waterloo. The conservative platform is dogma, with their evangelists castigating those who do not show proper devotion to the faith. To them, legislation is but a chessboard where black and white move their pieces through amendments and procedures to ultimately topple the opponent’s king.

Change takes time. The Presidency, control of the House, and a 20 member majority in the Senate is not a sufficient condition. Democrats need candidates that are not just electable but also effective, as well as the courage to believe that standing firm for our ideas can actually be a winning strategy. We need to enlarge the electorate by putting serious effort into engaging Millennials and minorities. Progressive victories have proved us to be on the right side of history–ending slavery, universal suffrage, the New Deal, and Medicare–and we need representatives that will make the right decision now and not worry about whether history will move fast enough to prove them right before the next election.

Change requires sacrifice and effort, new strategies, more profiles in courage, and a dream that will never die.

• 0 Comments

One of the big conservative talking points attempting to lure the youth vote is that the current health care bill would include a mandate to purchase health insurance without increasing affordability.

What they fail to mention is that it has been the GOP and a few conservative Democrats that have stripped away those things that would have made insurance more affordable.

It’s like someone sold you a bicycle and John Boehner jumps out and smashes it with a hammer, only to say “can you believe that guy sold you a broken bicycle?”

And what are these conservatives who are apparently so concerned about the plight of young Americans doing for us? Shutting down the Senate for 12 hours.

• 0 Comments

Now that John Shadegg has proven that he can understand the innermost political desires of infants, it’s only a matter of time until his skills improve to the point where he can become:

• 0 Comments

Some of the Democratic Stupak Amendment votes came from Representatives from very blue districts. Here are the Democrats that voted for the amendment sorted by Cook PVI. Bolded names also voted against HR 3962 itself.

Michael Doyle (PA-14) | D+19
Artur Davis (AL-7) | D+18
Joe Baca (CA-43) | D+13
Tim Ryan (OH-17) | D+12
Dale Kildee (MI-5) | D+11
Stephen Lynch (MA-9) | D+11
Daniel Lipinski (IL-3) | D+11
Marcy Kaptur (OH-9) | D+10
Silvestre Reyes (TX-16) | D+10
Jim Langevin (RI-2) | D+9
Richard Neal (MA-2) | D+9
Jim Costa (CA-20) | D+5
Paul Kanjorski (PA-11) | D+4
Dennis Cardoza (CA-18) | D+4
David Obey (WI-7) | D+3
Jim Cooper (TN-5) | D+3
James Oberstar (MN-8) | D+3
Michael Michaud (ME-2) | D+3
Jerry Costello (IL-12) | D+3
Steve Driehaus (OH-1) | D+1
John Barrow (GA-12) | D+1
Sanford Bishop (GA-2) | D+1
Henry Cuellar (TX-28) | EVEN
John Murtha (PA-12) | R+1
Joe Donnelly (IN-2) | R+2
Bob Etheridge (NC-2) | R+2
Charlie Wilson (OH-6) | R+2
Solomon Ortiz (TX-27) | R+2
Bart Stupak (MI-1) | R+3
Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-3) | R+3
John Boccieri (OH-16) | R+4
Ciro Rodriguez (TX-23) | R+4
Vic Snyder (AR-2) | R+5
John Salazar (CO-3) | R+5
Collin Peterson (MN-7) | R+5
Mike McIntyre (NC-7) | R+5
Tom Perriello (VA-5) | R+5
Baron Hill (IN-9) | R+6
Heath Shuler (NC-11) | R+6
Harry Teague (NM-2) | R+6
Jason Altmire (PA-4) | R+6
Tim Holden (PA-17) | R+6
John Tanner (TN-8) | R+6
Nick Rahall (WV-3) | R+6
Mike Ross (AR-4) | R+7
Zack Space (OH-18) | R+7
John Spratt (SC-5) | R+7
Marion Berry (AR-1) | R+8
Brad Ellsworth (IN-8) | R+8
Chris Carney (PA-10) | R+8
Ben Chandler (KY-6) | R+9
Alan Mollohan (WV-1) | R+9
Jim Marshall (GA-8) | R+10
Earl Pomeroy (ND-AL) | R+10
Parker Griffith (AL-5) | R+12
Charlie Melancon (LA-3) | R+12
Lincoln Davis (TN-4) | R+13
Bart Gordon (TN-6) | R+13
Ike Skelton (MO-4) | R+14
Travis Childers (MS-1) | R+14
Dan Boren (OK-2) | R+14
Jim Matheson (UT-2) | R+15
Bobby Bright (AL-2) | R+16
Gene Taylor (MS-4) | R+20

• 3 Comments

The following Democrats voted both for the Stupak Amendement and then voted against final passage of HR 3962.

Bobby Bright (AL-2)
Parker Griffith (AL-5)
Artur Davis (AL-7)
Mike Ross (AR-4)
Jim Marshall (GA-8)
John Barrow (GA-12)
Ben Chandler (KY-6)
Charlie Melancon (LA-3)
Collin Peterson (MN-7)
Ike Skelton (MO-4)
Travis Childers (MS-1)
Gene Taylor (MS-4)
Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
Heath Shuler (NC-11)
Harry Teague (NM-2)
John Boccieri (OH-16)
Dan Boren (OK-2)
Jason Altmire (PA-4)
Tim Holden (PA-17)
Lincoln Davis (TN-4)
Bart Gordon (TN-6)
John Tanner (TN-8)
Jim Matheson (UT-2)

• 16 Comments

The Republican Party may be in shambles, but conservative interest groups are still dominating progressives when it comes to issue advocacy. A big part of the problem is procrastination: most progressive organizations rely solely on last minute activism.

Conservatives have been so successful in their issue advocacy efforts because they begin the process way before there is a bill being considered or an important vote. They start persuasion programs far in advance; framing the debate, saturating the media, and activating local conservative networks.

Progressives have not been as successful because we tend to wait until a vote to begin organizing. Now, there are some exceptions; organized labor has been much better at getting a head of issues than the rest of the progressive movement, but for the most part our activism is last minute.

Many progressive organizations didn’t learn the lessons of the 1990s. They believed that passing progressive legislation would be a cakewalk with Democrats in control of the White House, a huge majority in the House and 60 votes in the Senate. The current struggle for health insurance reform shows how wrong they were.

A politician isn’t going to always do the right thing just because there is a (D) next to his or her name. Democrats often have to be pressured as much as the Republicans. In the future we must remember that as long as we rely solely on last minute activism, we are going to keep losing battles.

• 0 Comments

Today, the House of Representatives will vote on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a bill designed to help put money in the hands of working Americans to get our economy back on track.

As promised, President Obama said restoring prosperity and faith in financial institutions was his top priority. Together with bi-partisan leaders in Congress, the President has created a plan designed to provide more than stimulus; rather, we will invest in short-term needs to further long-term goals.

This bill has huge implications for young people. From unemployment insurance to higher education tax credits to investing in renewable energy, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is designed to safeguard our economic future.

The cost of doing too little outweighs the extraordinary cost of getting us out of this economic crisis. Congress must act now to pass this important legislation and get our economy moving again. Urge your Member of Congress to ACT NOW to pass this critical legislation.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act includes key provisions around higher education, including the new American Opportunity Tax Credit, which offers a tax credit of up to $2,500 for the cost of tuition and related expenses, increases the Pell grant maximum by $500 to $4,860 for the 2009-2010 academic year, and increases federal work-study funding. It will also invest in critical infrastructure such as investments in shovel-ready roadways and bridges projects, science and IT, technology in the health care industry to lower costs, and modernizing schools. The bill also provides for extensive investment in energy efficiency to modernize our electric grid, create green jobs, and provide tax credits for families and companies that use alternative energy. In addition to other key provisions, the legislation also provides tax credits for the middle class — another campaign promise — to provide relief for working families, small businesses, the unemployed, and others hit hardest by the economic crisis.

The bill has unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency to bring “sunshine” to our legislative process and help restore confidence on our government and financial institutions.

You can learn more on Speaker Pelosi’s website. You can also read President Obama’s plan and remarks on ARRP.

As young Americans and Young Democrats we must ACT NOW to urge our Members of Congress to work for our best interest in restoring America’s prosperity. This important legislation cannot wait. And our economic future is too important to be yet another political football. We urge bi-partisan support for this crucial bill.

We look forward to keeping you updated on the progress of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as the legislation progresses through Congress. Please help us broaden our impact by forwarding this email to five friends today!

Democratically Yours,
David Hardt
President
Young Democrats of America

• 0 Comments